It was the general Theory of Rela- tivity which showed in a convincing manner the incorrectness of this view. For this theory revealed that it was possible for us, using basic principles very far removed from those of Newton, to do justice to the entire range of the data of experience in a manner even more complete and satisfactory than was possible with Newton's principles.
But quite apart from the question of comparative merits, the fictitious character of the principles is made quite obvious by the fact that it is possible to exhibit two essentially different bases, each of which in its consequences leads to a large measure of agreement with experience. This indicates that any attempt logically to derive the basic concepts and laws of mechanics from the ultimate data of experience is doomed to failure.
Albert Einstein If then it is the case that the axiomatic basis of theoretical physics cannot be an inference from experience, but must be free invention, have we any right to hope that we shall find the correctway? Still more-does this correctapproachexist at all, save in our imagination? Have we any right to hope that ex- periencewill guideus aright,when thereare theories like classical mechanics which agree with experienceto a very great extent, even without comprehendingthe subjectin its depths?
To this I answerwith complete assurance,that in my opinion there is the correct path and, moreover, that it is in our power to find it. Ourexperienceup to datejustifiesus in feelingsurethat in Nature is actualized the ideal of mathematical simplicity. It is my conviction that pure mathematical construction enables us to discoverthe conceptsand the laws connectingthem which give us the key to the understanding of the phenomena of Nature.
Experience can of course guide us in our choice of serviceable mathematical concepts; it cannot possibly be the source from which they are derived; experience of course remains the sole criterionof the serviceabilityof a mathematicalconstructionfor physics, but the truly creative principleresides in mathematics. In a certainsense, therefore,I hold it to be true that pure thought is competentto comprehendthe real, as the ancientsdreamed.
To justify this confidence of mine, I must necessarily avail myself of mathematicalconcepts. The physical world is repre- sented as a four-dimensionalcontinuum. If in this I adopt a Riemannianmetric, and look for the simplest laws which such a metric can satisfy, I arrive at the relativistic gravitation-theory of empty space.
If I adopt in this space a vector-field, or in other words, the antisymmetricaltensor-fieldderived from it, and if I look for the simplest laws which such a field can satisfy, I arriveat the Maxwellequationsfor free space. Having reached this point we have still to seek a theory for those parts of space in which the electricaldensity does not van- ish. De Broglie surmised the existence of a wave-field, which could be used to explain certain quantum propertiesof matter. Dirac found in the 'spinor-field'quantities of a new kind, whose simplestequationsmake it possibleto deducea great many of the propertiesof the electron, including its quantum properties.
It is essential for our point of view that we can arrive at these constructions and the laws relating them one with another by adhering to the principle of searching for the mathematically simplest concepts and their connections.
In the paucity of the mathematically existent simple field-types and of the relations between them, lies the justification for the theorist's hope that he may comprehend reality in its depths.
The most difficult point for such a field-theory at present is how to include the atomic structure of matter and energy. For the theory in its basic principles is not an atomic one in so far as it operates exclusively with continuous functions of space, in contrast to classical mechanics whose most important feature, the material point, squares with the atomistic structure of matter. The modern quantum theory, as associated with the names of de Broglie, Schr6dinger, and Dirac, which of course operates with continuous functions, has overcome this difficulty by means of a daring interpretation, first given in a clear form by Max Born:-the space functions which appear in the equations make no claim to be a mathematical model of atomic objects.
These functions are only supposed to determine in a mathematical way the probabilities of encountering those objects in a particular place or in a particular state of motion, if we make a measure- ment. This conception is logically unexceptionable, and has led to important successes.
But unfortunately it forces us to employ a continuum of which the number of dimensions is not that of previous physics, namely 4, but which has dimensions increasing without limit as the number of the particles consti- tuting the system under examination increases.
I cannot help confessing that I myself accord to this interpretation no more than a transitory significance. On the other hand, it seems to me certain that we have to give up the notion of an absolute localization of the particles in a theoretical model. This seems to me to be the correct theoretical interpretation of Heisenberg's indeterminacy relation. And yet a theory may perfectly well exist, which is in a genuine sense an atomistic one and not merely on the basis of a particular interpretation , in which there is no localizing of the particles in a mathematical model.
For example, in order to include the atomistic character of electricity, the field equations only need to involve that a three-dimensional volume of space on whose boundary the electrical density vanishes everywhere, contains a total electrical charge of an integral amount. Thus in a continuum theory, the atomistic character could be satisfac- torily expressed by integral propositions without localizing the particles which constitute the atomistic system.
Only if this sort of representation of the atomistic structure be obtained could I regard the quantum problem within the frame- work of a continuum theory as solved. Related Papers. By Darrin Snyder Belousek. A Kantian Critique of Scientific Essentialism. By Robert Hanna. Applying Pure Mathematics. By Anthony F Peressini. Descrying the World in the Wave Function.
By Tim Maudlin. My God, He Plays Dice! By Bob Doyle. Download pdf. Log in with Facebook Log in with Google. Remember me on this computer. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. Need an account? Click here to sign up. General Physics: There are two versions of the introductory general physics sequence. Not open to students who have taken Physics ; Open to Freshmen.
The fundamental laws and principles of Classical Physics are the basis Modern Physics. Physics is the unity of theory, experiment and computation2. Moreover, the ability "to compute" forms part of the essen-tial repertoire of research scientists. This is the third of a sequence of three Physics courses Physics 3. The prerequisites for this course are Physics , or else Physics with the permission of the departmental chair.
Selected topics in modern physics. For special circumstances, your advisor can authorize an alternate introductory sequence. Sophomore Sequence. For physics students the computational quantum physics courses is a recommended prerequisite for any computationally oriented semester thesis, proseminar, master thesis or doctoral thesis.
For physics students the computational quantum physics courses is a recommended prerequisite for any computationally oriented semester thesis, proseminar, diploma the-sis or doctoral thesis. What is Physics?
Physics is the most fundamental of the sciences. Its goal is to learn how the Universe works at the most fundamental level—and to discover the basic laws by which it operates. Theoretical physics concentrates on developing the theory and mathematics of these laws, while applied physics focuses attention on the.
However, there has been progressive theoretical work Sen et al. Overview 1. Present: Results- Where are we? Here, the latest ndings in string theory and other areas of theoretical physics are discussed. A hundred years ago, the Munich nursery of theoretical physics as Sommerfeld liked to describe his institute was a …. The recent formation of the Mani L. In today's environment, with tight funding in fundamental theoretical research, only those universities that have institutes can attract the best minds and most exciting theory research.
Particle physics 8. Nuclear physics 9. Plasma physics Relation of physics to other subjects Since physics enables us to understand basic components of matter and their mutual interactions it forms the base of natural science. Biology and chemistry bor. Classical physics encompasses. Table of Contents. This is an algebra-trigonometry based course. The textbook used for this course is Physics, ninth edition,.
T21 J. Murphy, Charles E. AP Physics 1 is an algebra-based, introductory college-level physics course. Students cultivate their understanding of physics through inquiry-based investigations as they explore.
Physics: Volume 2 Richard T. Weidner, Robert L. Sells Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
0コメント